Page Header Logo

Cover Page

Journal Content
Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
Atom logo
RSS2 logo
RSS1 logo
  • About the Journal
  • Aims and Scope
  • Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Review Process
  • Privacy Statement
  • Article Processing charges
  • Publication Ethics
  • Open Access
  • Copyright and License
  • Archive Policy
  • Plagiarism Policy

Template Cover Page Cover Page
Similarity Checker

Cover Page

Member of

Cover Page

Statistics


Flag Counter

  • Home
  • Current
  • Announcement
  • Archive
  • Editorial Team
  • Reviewers
  • Contact us
  • Search
Home > Articles

Comparative Analysis of Multicriteria Inventory Classification and Forecasing: A Case Study in PT XYZ

  • Dhanang Purwandaru
    Universitas Indonesia

  • Yova Ruldeviyani
    Universitas Indonesia

  • Sani Nugraheni
    Universitas Indonesia

  • Galuh Prisillia
    Universitas Indonesia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v6i4.1014
Keywords: Inventory Management, Small and Medium-sized Enterprise, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Soluti, ARIMA, LSTM

Abstract

One crucial aspect of supply chain management is inventory management. Inefficient inventory management can lead to various issues, such as product expiration, where a high number of items in the warehouse either have expired or are approaching expiration. This issue is experienced by a distribution SME in Indonesia, PT XYZ. Without such classifications, it becomes challenging to predict demand and manage stock levels efficiently. Therefore, the aim of this study is to classify inventory to identify the most important items to business and make a forecasting model of sales quantity to predict inventory replenishment using machine learning algorithms. To advance our research, we adopted the Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology. For inventory classification, we conducted a hybrid approach that combined TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and ABC analysis (A: high-value items, B: medium-value items, and C: low-value items). The data employed in this study comprised secondary data, including purchase orders, sales orders, and stock movement records. The result reveals that 11 of the total 383 items under class A are important items for business. After obtaining labels from the ABC Analysis, we proceed to train models using KNN, SVC, and Random Forest for predicting inventory classification. Notably, the Random Forest model showcased remarkable performance and outperformed the rest of the models, achieving an accuracy of 99.21%. For inventory forecasting ARIMA displays a competitive performance with RMSE value 5.305 and MAE value 3.476, indicating a relatively accurate prediction with lower forecasting errors than two other models

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wisetsri, W., Donthu, S., Mehbodniya, A., Vyas, S., Quiñonez-Choquecota, J., & Neware, R. (2022). An investigation on the impact of digital revolution and machine learning in supply chain management. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 3207-3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.367

Boute, R. N., Gijsbrechts, J., Van Jaarsveld, W., & Vanvuchelen, N. (2022). Deep reinforcement learning for inventory control: A roadmap. European Journal of Operational Research, 298(2), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.016

Harifi, S., Khalilian, M., Mohammadzadeh, J., & Ebrahimnejad, S. (2021). Optimization in solving inventory control problem using nature inspired Emperor Penguins Colony algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, 1361-1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01616-8

Wang, Z., & Mersereau, A. J. (2017). Bayesian inventory management with potential change‐points in demand. Production and Operations Management, 26(2), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12650

Islam, S. S., Pulungan, A. H., & Rochim, A. (2019, December). Inventory management efficiency analysis: A case study of an SME company. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1402, No. 2, p. 022040). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022040

Munyaka, J. B., & Yadavalli, V. S. S. (2022). Inventory management concepts and implementations: a systematic review. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 33(2), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.7166/33-2-2527

Teplická, K., & Čulková, K. (2020). Using of optimizing methods in inventory management of the company. Acta logistica, 7(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v7i1.150

Hartley, J. L., & Sawaya, W. J. (2019). Tortoise, not the hare: Digital transformation of supply chain business processes. Business Horizons, 62(6), 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.006

Wirth, R., & Hipp, J. (2000, April). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on the practical applications of knowledge discovery and data mining (Vol. 1, pp. 29-39).

Brzozowska, J., Pizoń, J., Baytikenova, G., Gola, A., Zakimova, A., & Piotrowska, K. (2023). Data engineering in CRISP-DM process production data–case study. Applied Computer Science, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2023-26

El-Morr, C., Jammal, M., Ali-Hassan, H., & El-Hallak, W. (2022). Machine Learning for Practical Decision Making. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16990-8_4

Pohl, M., Haertel, C., Staegemann, D., & Turowski, K. (2023). The Linkage to Business Goals in Data Science Projects. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2023/60/

Ramadhan, Z. I., & Widiputra, H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Recurrent Neural Network Models Performance in Predicting Bitcoin Prices. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), 8(3), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v8i3.5810

Papathanasiou, J., Ploskas, N., Papathanasiou, J., & Ploskas, N. (2018). Topsis (pp. 1-30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91648-4_1

Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal, 2, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021

Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Cortes, C. (1995). Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning

Cheng, D., Zhang, S., Deng, Z., Zhu, Y., & Zong, M. (2014). k NN algorithm with data-driven k value. In Advanced Data Mining and Applications: 10th International Conference, ADMA 2014, Guilin, China, December 19-21, 2014. Proceedings 10 (pp. 499-512). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14717-8_39

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5-32.

Zhang, J., Liu, H., Bai, W., & Li, X. (2024). A hybrid approach of wavelet transform, ARIMA and LSTM model for the share price index futures forecasting. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 69, 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2023.102022

Zaini, N., Ahmed, A. N., Ean, L. W., Chow, M. F., & Malek, M. A. (2023). Forecasting of fine particulate matter based on LSTM and optimization algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, 139233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139233

Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific model development, 7(3), 1247-1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014

Garcia-Arteaga, J., Zambrano-Zambrano, J., Parraga-Alava, J., & Rodas-Silva, J. (2024). An effective approach for identifying keywords as high-quality filters to get emergency-implicated Twitter Spanish data. Computer Speech & Language, 84, 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2023.101579

Greenland, A. (2021). Deployment and Life Cycle Management. In INFORMS Analytics Body of Knowledge (pp. 275-310). INFORMS. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119505914.ch8

Shekhovtsov, A., & Kołodziejczyk, J. (2020). Do distance-based multi-criteria decision analysis methods create similar rankings?. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 3718-3729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.015

DOWNLOAD
Published
2024-12-31
Issue
Vol. 6, No. 4 (December 2024)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Purwandaru, D., Ruldeviyani, Y., Nugraheni, S., & Prisillia, G. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Multicriteria Inventory Classification and Forecasing: A Case Study in PT XYZ. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 6(4), 732-739. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v6i4.1014
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Indexing and Abstractions:

Published:

       Creative Commons License
       This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0).